If a conservative did it...

The title of this blog is like the OJ book, but it is to introduce a new feature to conservative uncensored.

Imagine these headlines...
1) Bush administration releases memo to be on alert for "left-wing extremists."
2) Governor Sarah Palin buys stock in spouses employer after securing earmarked funds from state legislature, before the deal is announced.

Imagine what Olberjerk-off would do if these things were true. Hell not even anyone as extreme as Olberjerk-off, how would the SCUM at CNN, ABC or CBS report these things? Many of you have figured out what I'm driving at, here's what really happenend this week.

1) Fire Napolitano

http://video1.washingtontimes.com/video/extremismreport.pdf

DHS Chief Janet Napolotano released a security memo last week to be on the alert for "right-wing" extremists (linked above).

Now I've read into the memo. Admittedly it starts by talking about the most extreme racist factions. But why did the government use the term "right-wing," instead of racist, or militant-relgious. If you read further down (bottom of p.4 on the linked pdf) you see...

"Many rightwing extremists are antagonistic toward the new presidential administration and its perceived stance on a range of issues, including immigration and citizenship, the expansion of social programs to minorities, and restrictions on firearms ownership and use."

Think about this, you can be defined as an right-wing extremist if you happen to believe
*In the preservation of the 2nd amendment
*There should be a reduction in social programs
*If you believe in people coming to the country legally.

What is mind boggling about this is that this is exactly the kind of thing the left accused the Patriot Act of doing. But people crying out against the Patriot Act are incredibly silent about this, because this is persecution of opposing ideas, not their own. This is in Black and White, plain as day an attempt to The height of hypocracy.

Republican's have resigned over far less, Napalotono's head should roll, except for the fact Pres. Obama doesn't give a damn about the constitution.

2) DiFi (new CU blogword, CA Senator Diane Feinstein) caught in insider trading

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/21/senate-husbands-firm-cashes-in-on-crisis/

DiFi has been caught earmarking money for his husbands firm who benefits from all of this real-estate bailout money. Her Husband's firm got $25B from the taxpayer and he with the rest of the board made many millions more by repurchasing stock without disclosing this inside information.

Read the story for yourself, it's 9 pages long, but you get the details about how DiFi's husband and company made money off of $25B of our taxpayer dollars, sick.

C'mon dems, defend Howard Dean on this....

AAL4:

All right dems, excuse this...

http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2009/03/red_eye_skewers.php

It's well documented at olbermannwatch.com that Obeljerk-off, is, well a jerk-off. (BTW if anyone from NBC sports is reading I haven't watched an NFL pre-game or halftime show because Olberjerk-off is at the desk).

But Howard Dean hoping we'll forget about the things he said about President Bush and other republicains when he was in office.

"You know, the Republicans are not very friendly to different kinds of people. They're a pretty monolithic party. Pretty much, they all behave the same, and they all look the same. ... It's pretty much a white Christian party.''

"This president is not interested in being a good president. He's interested in some complicated psychological situation that he has with his father."

"You think people can work all day and then pick up their kids at child care or wherever and get home and still manage to sandwich in an eight-hour vote? Well Republicans, I guess can do that. Because a lot of them have never made an honest living in their lives." (unlike many Kennedy's apparantly)

"I hate Republicans and everything they stand for. "

"John Ashcroft is not a patriot, John Ashcroft is a descendant of Joseph McCarthy. "

“As long as George Bush is president, we are going to create a permanent class system, ... And we're going to change that as soon as we can. What George Bush has done is give our money to his friends paying for his re-election. He made it impossible for people like you to go to college.”

These quotes are from those right wing nut-jobs at brainyquote.com and thinkexist.com (DIS, new CU blogword, "Dripping in sarcasm"). Many of these were mentioned in TV's Andy Levy's "Red Eye" halftime report if you made to the final minute of the video linked above...

My point is I guess everything Dean said is okay, as long as he didn't say "facist." Of course no one on CNN or MSNBC is going to call Dean on this (there's a reason he went on the program with the biggest idiot on cable news). In the meantime CNN's D.L. Hughley is all to happy to call the GOP Nazi's right to Chairman Steele's face.

C'mon dems, defend your position that the right wing is lying about media bias. I f**king dare you!

Rush is Right, and maybe a little wrong...

AAL1:

Shocking title I know, that I would say the Maha Rushie is ever incorrect, we'll get to that later.

First, if you haven't had a chance to see his C-PAC speech, you need to. And if you're a leftist, frankly I dare you.

Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qtvtBGWgBc

Don't worry, it's a CNN feed for those of you who are allergic to "We Report, You Decide." I couldn't find a "pure feed" searching CNN video, just videos of all their panelists complaining about Rush, no see for yourself type links.

Transcript: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_030209/content/01125106.guest.html

Sorry distracted by my SCUM barbs...

Rush on race...
"You know what the cliche is, a conservative: racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe. Excuse me, ladies and gentlemen of America, if you were paying attention, I know you were, the racism in our culture was exclusively and fully on display in the Democrat primary last year. [Applause]
It was not us asking whether Barack Obama was authentic. What we were asking is: Is he wrong? We concluded, yes. We still think so. But we didn't ask if he was authentically black. We didn't say, as some Southern Christian Leadership Conference leaders said: Barack is not authentic, he's not got any slave blood. He's really not down for the struggle, but his wife is."

Contrary to the what the hate-mongering SCUM would have you believe, it is not the right that has (to paraphrase Dr. King) judged Pres. Obama by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character. But to the left everything that can be about race, is about race. Which means there is no honest disagreement with them as long as any critisim is assumed to be racial.

Rush on the role of politicians...
"All politicians including President Obama are temporary stewards of this nation. It is not their task to remake the founding of this country. It is not their task to tear it apart and rebuild it in their image."

This is why conservatives are disgusted with how much Pres. Obama and the liberals (including republicans Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe and Arlen Specter) are spending. Taking from the earners and giving to the irresponsible. That is not the principle this country was founded on. Obama should not be trying to change this about our nation, but he is.

Wanting Obama to fail...
First off Rush Limbaugh saying "I hope [Obama] fails" is the last line in a context of Obama's plans to change the United States into a socialist nation we don't recognize. Be that as it may, the only problem I have with the language "I hope he fails" is the implication that it's Limbaugh's hope that will make the difference...

At conservativeuncensored.com, we believe that Obama's policies are bad, regardless of who's hoping for what. It doesn't matter if Limbaugh gets 3 wishes from a genie or not. Obama's policies WILL FAIL, regardless of who hopes for it. I think even Limbaugh agrees with that.

Obama's Tax Cuts for the Wealthy!

2nd Day of the Dependent States of America...
AAL1 (I'm actually kind of giddy)

Tax Cuts for the Wealthy:

http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-stimulus-saves-microsoft-billionaire-hundreds-of-millions-phew-2009-2

Where's the SCUM crying about Pres. Obama? This is his baby. Is it possible that it isn't possible to target tax-cuts or stimulus after all. Everyone that whined about Bush doing tax cuts for the rich are strangly silent on this. Hilarious Hyporites they are!

Soak the rich doesn't work:

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg admitted that only about 40,000 NYC residents produce 50% of the city's tax revenue.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/02142009/news/regionalnews/bloomy_blasts_rich_tax_155116.htm

RIR: What Becomes of NYC's other 6.96 million residents if these 40,000 move away?

On the Homefront:

NYC residents perhaps should move to Sioux Falls, SD. That's what Minneapolis Based TCF bank is planning to do...

http://www.twincities.com/ci_11692951?IADID=Search-www.twincities.com-www.twincities.com

"Soak the rich" the mantra of liberals everywhere is being shown as the failure and the politics of childeshness that it is...

New Holiday...

In Honor of President Obama puting every amerian man, woman and child on the hook for an average of $30,000 each with the signing of his stimulus bill Tuesday. Conservativeuncensored.com will be observing February 17, 2009 as "Dependence Day" (new CUB) as this is now the day the Dependant State of America are born.

Well maybe not all the states, some governors get that they're selling their souls to the feds if they take the stimulus bribe...

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-02-18-gopstimulus_N.htm

N-Poo can't count

AAL1:

Of course since President Bush didn't say it the SCUM won't say mum.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8hMJVXt09E

ACORN and the Supreme Court

AAL2: Surpisingly Calm

So Friday's big news was that SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United State) denied the Ohio GOP's.

I'm going to claim ignorance, but I think SCOTUS basically said since the Ohio GOP isn't a "citizen" they don't have the standing to bring this case.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D93SBR781&show_article=1

So don't confuse this decision with the innocence of Ohio secratary of state Jennifer Brunner, though CNN, and the rest of the SCUM seem to be content to bury this fact at the bottom of the story, saying it's a "victory."

This was basically thrown out on a technicality, that the law wasn't designed for civil action. It sounds like another challenge will mount.

That said, I do understand the other side of this, and this is one situation where I would prefer the scalpel to the hatchet. I think they need to be careful how they purge the roles, and make sure they are following up on the discrepancies and not just discarding them. It wouldn't be the first time government information is wrong, and disenfranchising voters because the DMV has the wrong address wouldn't be right.

It would be decent of Brunner to at least acknowledge that she shares the goal of an honest election and supports the idea of getting fraudulent registrations off the rolls. However, at best I interpret her actions as she's decided to be apathetic about this (at worst she's conspiring, but I'll need more proof on that) for whatever reason, and seems okay with the risks posed with fraudulent names on the rolls, which I find irresponsible.

This isn't over, those sounding the Brunner victory horns may have to backpedal...

Joe the Plumber (Can we fix it, yes we can)...

AAL 2:

This is a little Limbaugh Echo Syndrome here, but I do want to ask, "What if the media investiaged Sen. Barak Obama the same way they've investigated Joe the Plumber?"

The SCUM seem to be very selective who they go after. They've turned Sarah Palin's life upside down within a couple days of her selection, they've done the same now with Joe the Plumber (who knew he would be the October Suprise).

But there's no way you can say CNN has been that in-depth on Obama. Otherwise, Rev. Wright would've come to light a year ago when radio host Sean Hannity was beating that drum, or more people would know about mobster Rezko giving Obama a sweetheart deal (I'm not going to use "bribe" in two posts in a row, oops too late) on his house. Or Biden, caught plagerizing a speech from the British parliment, if you are hearing these things for the first time, you're a victim of the SCUM.

Even a columust at Slate (no bastion of conservative thought mind you) admitted Biden is getting very different treatment than Palin.

http://www.slate.com/id/2200302/

We pause here for a couple asides:

* For the Record, Fox is reporting that Joe the plumber isn't expected to earn above the OWL (new blogword, Obama Wealth Limit, slang for $250,000, sample sentence: New York Ranger Aaron Voros now earns 4 OWLs a year since leaving the Minnesota Wild), and reporting that he has tax liens and may not be licensed. I got all that without having to watch a SCUM network like CNN or MSNBC.

* This post was originally going to be added thoughts from the debate, I did want to say Schieffer did the best job of all the moderaters. I liked his question formula "You said, such and such and you said such and such, why are you right and why does the other guy suck."

Back to the post:

All I wanted to establish is the right never get a fair shake, those that disagree with the right seldom go after the ideas (there are exceptions), they go after the person. I get it that with regular politicans, they put themselves in the public eye. But if the personal attacks aren't backed up by policy relavance it's sounds flat.

I do find it disturbing that the SCUM have gone after a voter for just asking the politican a legitamate question. If every voter gets scrutinized this heavily for asking questions I weep for the 1st Amendment (much I like I did after McCain-Feingold passed, but that's another issue).

Does the fact that Joe the Plumber is still below the OWL mean that he's not allowed to believe in not screwing those above the OWL? This is certainly the implication of Obama's condesending question "How many plumbers do you know that make $250,000?" As if that disqualifies Joe from having an opinion about those above the OWL?

Does the fact that Joe the Plumber isn't licensed mean he's not allowed to ask Obama about the OWL?

Does the fact that Joe the Plumber owes taxes mean he's not allowed to ask Obama about the OWL?

If you answered yes to any of those questions you have a serious 1st amendment problem. Joe the Plumbers alleged problem probably mean he's too checkered to run for president, but remember there was only one guy running for president in that conversation, and it wasn't Joe.

The guy that answered the question gave the "share the wealth" answer, that's an answer american on all parts of the political spectrum don't like. That is now a problem for the Obama campaign. And to cover the fact they need to run from that answer, they are attacking the questioner.

Do you really Believe Sarah Palin is Racist?

Anger Alert Level: 3 (Elevated)

Someone needs to explain to me how Gov. Sarah Palin's comment on Saturday about Sen. Obama's associations with known terrorist turned college professor (lateral move) William Ayers: "Our opponent ... is someone who sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect, imperfect enough, that he's palling around with terrorists who would target their own country," is "a racially tinged subtext" as AP "journalist" Douglass Daniel states in this article:

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D93KD6Q00&show_article=1

You know I get that the SCUM (new CU blogword, So-Called Unbiased Media) talking point is that this when Obama was 8 years old, but the deeper you get into this the less true that is.

We'll set that aside for now, All Palin is talking about is specifically people that would turn on their own country. For Palin to have slighted a whole race, or all races, as Dumbass Dougie asserts here, he has to believe that all minorities (or whoever he thinks Palin is slighting here) are ready to "target their own country." All this is yet another example of a SCUM journalist that has been taught that Sarah Palin is a religious republican, all republicans and religous people are racist, therefore Sarah Palin must be a racist in everything she said.

Furthermore, we have heard from some Democrat Congresspeople..

---
from Brit Hume http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,434747,00.html:

[Representative] Yvette Clark was critical of Sarah Palin's repeated appeals to "Joe Six-Pack" and "hockey moms." "Who exactly is Joe Six-Pack and who are these hockey moms?... Is that supposed to be terminology that is of common ground to all Americans? I don't find that. It leaves a lot of people out," Clark said.

Congressman Gregory Meeks says in The New York Observer, "They are trying to throw out these codes. He's 'not one of us?' That's racial. That's fear."
----

I'm sorry this anger is way unfounded on the part of these congresspeople. They are acting like like "Joe six-pack", "Hockey Mom" and "doesn't see the country the way we see it" are passwords for a KKK meeting. (If in fact they were they could just ask former KKK member Sen. Robert Byrd, D-WV).

"Joe six-pack" doens't mean "white joe six-pack," it means working class person. Obama is "not one of us" because, he's black. It's because McCain believes that Obama doesn't see the goodness in the country and sympathises with its enemies.

I'm going to break "hockey mom" down a little. The truth is most "hockey moms" are white, but not white and exclusive. Clark's comment impling that "hockey mom" is exclduing minorities is a sterotype on the same level as "White Men Can't Jump," which I guess in this case could mean a white woman, and Palin shouldn'tve been a high school basketball player. Now I don't belive this what Clark is saying, but you have to understand her implication is on the same level. That if one is believable so is the other.

But republicans NEVER get the benefit of the doubt with the SCUM. Anything they can stretch into racism they will, and I hope the electorate sees through that.